Art Analysis Essay : Arch of Constantine
650 word length, double spaced 1-2 pages.
Describe the abstract visual communication and poetry of artworks
Describe how the audience is meant to perceive and move through the artwork visually and abstractly (ex. visual pathways, orders of viewing, hierarchy – dominant, subdominant, and subordinate content, visual organization, and abstraction of visual communication, aesthetics, visual perception, etc.)
Use the elements and principles of art to describe an artwork
Describe the abstraction and aesthetic qualities of the work
Develop an essay with a thesis statement/introduction, supporting body, and conclusion that synthesizes the statements and thesis into a final idea about what the audience should remember and take away from the assignment
Use description as evidence to support the thesis and any other support statements.
If neccessary, do research. Use CRAAP standards to evaluate sources for academic value and use the Chicago or Turabian citation method to document sources. Extra research is not required, you may find all you need as evidence from the descriptions of the work.
Formal Analysis – The Assignment
Last time we focused on description. Now we are moving on to Formal Analysis. You will use the description of the object which focused more on the elements of art and now add the principles of art. We are going to look at the overall compositional idea of the image and deal with the visual poetry of the object. Select an artwork from this week’s readings (any work from any textbook chapter covered in Module 2)
This assignment requires a detailed description of the “formal” qualities of the art object (formal here means “related to the form,” not “fancy” or “elegant”). In other words, you’re looking at the individual design elements, such as composition (arrangement of parts of or in the work), color, line, texture, scale, proportion, balance, contrast, and rhythm. Your primary concern in this assignment is to attempt to explain how the artist arranges and uses these various elements.
Usually you have to go and look at the object for a long time and then write down what you see. As you will see from assignment description, a highly detailed description of the object is expected. You might struggle with this assignment because it is hard to translate what you see into words—don’t give up. Take more notes than you might think you need.
Why are you asked to do this assignment? First, translating something from a visual language to a textual language is one of the most vital tasks of the art historian. Most art historians at some point describe fully and accurately their objects of study in order to communicate their ideas about them. You may already have found this tendency helpful in reading your textbook or other assigned readings. Second, your instructors realize that you are not accustomed to scrutinizing objects in this way and know that you need practice doing so. Instructors who assign formal analyses want you to look—and look carefully. Think of the object as a series of decisions that an artist made. Your job is to figure out and describe, explain, and interpret those decisions and why the artist may have made them.
Ideally, if you were to give your written formal analysis to a friend who had never seen the object, s/he would be able to describe or draw the object for you, or at least pick it out of a lineup.
In writing a formal analysis, focus on creating a logical order so that your reader doesn’t get lost. Don’t ever assume that because your instructor has seen the work, he or she knows what you are talking about. Here are a couple of options:
· summarize the overall appearance, then describe the details of the object
· describe the composition and then move on to a description of the materials used (acrylic, watercolor, plaster)
· begin discussing one side of the work and then move across the object to the other side
· describe things in the order in which they draw your eye around the object, starting with the first thing you notice and moving to the next
Some instructors want your formal analysis to consist of pure description with little or no interpretation. In this case, you should just describe your object.